|
Post by Nik on Nov 8, 2009 15:15:49 GMT 1
I work away, but not at home. I delight the opposition and strike fear into the heart of those who oppose us. What am I?
The two faces of Guiseley's 4-3-3 formation (4-5-1 if you insist, but that doesn't say much for the other two strikers playing out of position).
Are the home fans over-reacting? Should we have a different approach at Fort Neth? Is Steve Burton the only tall forward we have? Why have we signed two wingers when there is no room for wide players in the current setup?
|
|
|
Post by theprisoner on Nov 8, 2009 15:35:41 GMT 1
I thought yesterday was the Christmas tree formation 1-4-3-2-1. Don't worry Kitty and Thomo have to take it down 12 days after Xmas.
...& Bett is really a striker rather than a winger (similar in some ways to Wally).
|
|
|
Post by Nik on Nov 8, 2009 16:02:13 GMT 1
Well this is the very nub of the matter.
4-3-3 with three strikers is one thing, but if Lloyd and Merris are pinned back as they were for much of the game yesterday (Lloyd never once made it to the byline that I can remember) then the 'wide forwards' end up completely out of their zone on the wings.
Tucky sure as heck ain't left footed either, so let's not have him out there again please.
But away from home, Tucky and Wally have been quite dangerous coming into the box from a slightly wide position, so we get back to the question - why has it been so rubbish at Neth all season?
|
|
|
Post by goodstuff on Nov 8, 2009 16:15:13 GMT 1
why no option for 352?
|
|
|
Post by Nik on Nov 8, 2009 20:11:00 GMT 1
Because our defence already works. No sense to turn it terrible like Liverpool's.
|
|
|
Post by adambrid on Nov 8, 2009 20:57:05 GMT 1
Lol Hilarious when they got 2 players sent of last week And that draw against Lyon just capped it all of I hate liverpool AB
|
|
|
Post by Nik on Nov 8, 2009 21:14:56 GMT 1
I'm not a fan, but when they played three centre backs recently for no reason it was pretty funny to watch.
|
|
|
Post by adambrid on Nov 9, 2009 20:41:24 GMT 1
Yeh AB
|
|