|
|
Post by bigj on Nov 21, 2022 21:26:38 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by rallyman on Nov 22, 2022 13:42:03 GMT 1
Sounds like the club as been given details of the culprit & passed on said details to the police as well as banning the individual from Guiseley AFC. They are still looking into any accomplices.
Rallyman
|
|
|
|
Post by colinl on Nov 22, 2022 16:55:24 GMT 1
How will any banned person be identified at the turnstiles and whose responsibility will it be to ensure that they do not gain entry?
|
|
|
|
Post by bigj on Nov 22, 2022 17:24:02 GMT 1
Stick an A4 mugshot on the turnstile wall wall and if the little scroat turns up don't let him in and ask if he wants a free Lucazade as compo.
|
|
|
|
Post by adambrid on Nov 22, 2022 17:27:28 GMT 1
A further statement has been issued by the club this morning: We can confirm that whilst we await the outcome of the investigation from Cheshire Police and Warrington Town FC, the individual identified as having entered the pitch at the Cantilever Stadium is banned indefinitely, with immediate effect, from attending all Guiseley AFC home and away matches. When the investigation is completed and we can ascertain the level of their involvement in the wider incident we may review the length of the ban if deemed appropriate. This is thanks to several emails from fellow supporters, images provided by those in attendance and linking these to the widely circulated footage. We would like to thank all those who have contributed. We have submitted all evidence we have to West Yorkshire Police and asked that they pass this onto their colleagues at Cheshire Police who have been in contact with Warrington Town, so they can continue their investigations into the contents of the bottle and the events that followed. Once we receive the match footage from Warrington Town we will continue in our efforts to identify the individual’s accomplices and take necessary action against these. Guiseley AFC Supporters’ Club have also banned this individual from travelling on their match day coaches. Full statement here: guiseleyafc.co.uk/update-incident-at-warrington-town/AB |
|
|
|
Post by MrP on Nov 22, 2022 20:48:37 GMT 1
Sounds like the club as been given details of the culprit & passed on said details to the police as well as banning the individual from Guiseley AFC. They are still looking into any accomplices. Rallyman Presumably they must also have travelled via Supporters Bus and should therefore be known too. It would be a poor do all round if they hang out the poor lad alone but not those that encouraged and filmed…. |
|
bee
Northern Counties East
Posts: 19 
|
Post by bee on Nov 22, 2022 22:53:06 GMT 1
"poor lad" ? Are you for real ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nik on Nov 22, 2022 22:58:37 GMT 1
"poor lad" ? Are you for real ? He’s literally asking for more punishments so I don’t suppose he’s saying what you think he is. |
|
|
|
Post by roguewon on Nov 23, 2022 0:54:17 GMT 1
Phrasing...That's all.
I'm condoning nothing. But...
The culprit wasn't alone, that is obvious. Just because he swapped the bottle doesn't make him guilty of anything else. That's what I took from the update.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrP on Nov 23, 2022 8:56:59 GMT 1
"poor lad" ? Are you for real ? Ok I could have phrased it differently but essentially he didn’t act alone and likely travelled with the others involved so it should be possible to identify them all if on the bus. My anger is passing, my embarrassment is not. |
|
|
|
Post by colinl on Nov 23, 2022 13:08:15 GMT 1
Stick an A4 mugshot on the turnstile wall wall and if the little scroat turns up don't let him in and ask if he wants a free Lucazade as compo. Surely it’s the responsibility of the paid professional security outfit to police this situation and not our volunteer turnstile operators. In any case these scroats should not be allowed to get anywhere near a turnstile. |
|
|
|
Post by Nik on Nov 23, 2022 19:44:49 GMT 1
Stick an A4 mugshot on the turnstile wall wall and if the little scroat turns up don't let him in and ask if he wants a free Lucazade as compo. Surely it’s the responsibility of the paid professional security outfit to police this situation and not our volunteer turnstile operators. Isn't it both? If they're allowed into the ground and then session staff have to try and spot people in the crowd who usually won't be there, it's not really a ban is it? |
|
|
|
Post by colinl on Nov 23, 2022 22:10:24 GMT 1
Surely it’s the responsibility of the paid professional security outfit to police this situation and not our volunteer turnstile operators. Isn't it both? If they're allowed into the ground and then session staff have to try and spot people in the crowd who usually won't be there, it's not really a ban is it? As I posted earlier, these scroats should not even get near a turnstile so should never get into the ground legitimately. |
|
|
|
Post by Nik on Nov 23, 2022 23:29:10 GMT 1
Isn't it both? If they're allowed into the ground and then session staff have to try and spot people in the crowd who usually won't be there, it's not really a ban is it? As I posted earlier, these scroats should not even get near a turnstile so should never get into the ground legitimately. I agree with the sentiment but sincerely I don’t understand what you’re meaning. How would you stop someone from approaching the turnstiles? |
|
|
|
Post by colinl on Nov 25, 2022 2:04:42 GMT 1
By stationing one of the security personel just outside each pair of turnstiles to identify any of the suspects and turn them away.
|
|
